home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- >
- >sorry if i'm being thick here but i havn't seen any proofs here, if you have the
- >proof please show it, it's easy to say something is impossible more difficult to
- >prove it though.
-
- You have already been told that the proof exists.
-
- Just go to a library and look it up.
- It is a bit difficult to include mathematical symbols
- in ASCII mail, and one simply doesn't have the time
- to type a proof in, though I don't think it is very long.
-
- Guys, tell him which book it can be found in!
-
-
-
-
- >me paranoid, don't make me laugh and i suggest that if you have nothing useful to logically
- >contradict my claim then don't reply anymore, i haven't the time nor the energy to try to explain
- >something which is obviously beyond your reach of understanding this, well don't feel so bad as it
- >happens to the best of us sometimes including me. again, theories aren't proofs, don't confuse the
- >2, just becuase a theory works in some practical cases doesn't mean it'll work every time.
- It is not a theory.
-
- It is a THEOREM. Which means it has been proved!
-
- Like the sampling THEOREM!
-
-
- >your inability
- >to investigate and simply rely on predetermined theories seems to overshadow your sense of logical
- >thinking,
-
- Well, you can try to investigate as much as you like.
- In the end, your static translator might even work with
- a couple of programs, if it can cope with enough cases.
- I am just worried that you might have died before
- you manage to get it work with something more complex than
- printf "Hello World".
- And even in a static translator, you will HAVE to
- dynamically allocate pseudo-memory to your
- translated programs, so it just defeats the whole point,
- doesn't it?
-
-
-
- PS.
- I would have told you about the paper that contains the
- proof you want myself, but I can't recall it.
- Just look for it yourself.
-
-
-
-